Hi, Brad. I installed Beersmith 2.3 this week and am enjoying the new features. Thanks for a great update.
I just brewed a new beer last week, so the timing is great to try out the new Fermentation Readings option. I'm impressed with the feature overall, but I'm struggling a bit with one thing. When I enter a reading, I have to know what both the Temperature and Gravity are. I have very good control of the temperature, but I don't take gravity readings every day. So I'm forced to either "guess" at the SG or use the previous reading, neither of which is very accurate. Why not allow the Gravity to be optional? In your graph, you could then interpolate between only the readings that are actually entered and not worry about the others. Probably makes sense to do the same with Temperature as well, but I can't really see a reason why I'd have an SG reading without Temp too.
Or perhaps you intended it to work this way and thus have some advice for how I should be making these readings?
Thanks again for the great software!
I just brewed a new beer last week, so the timing is great to try out the new Fermentation Readings option. I'm impressed with the feature overall, but I'm struggling a bit with one thing. When I enter a reading, I have to know what both the Temperature and Gravity are. I have very good control of the temperature, but I don't take gravity readings every day. So I'm forced to either "guess" at the SG or use the previous reading, neither of which is very accurate. Why not allow the Gravity to be optional? In your graph, you could then interpolate between only the readings that are actually entered and not worry about the others. Probably makes sense to do the same with Temperature as well, but I can't really see a reason why I'd have an SG reading without Temp too.
Or perhaps you intended it to work this way and thus have some advice for how I should be making these readings?
Thanks again for the great software!