Jason_Otto
New Forum Member
- Joined
- Dec 29, 2015
- Messages
- 2
- Reaction score
- 0
If I find a mistake in the water profiles is there someone to contact about correcting that in future editions? The profile for Milwaukee, WI lists the calcium and magnesium hardness correctly at 96ppm and 47ppm respectively for a total hardness of 143ppm (medium hard water). Milwaukee's complete Consumer Confidence Report from 2013 lists the concentration of metallic calcium and magnesium at 34ppm and 12ppm respectively. I work for the Milwaukee Water works and I know these data are correct.
The profile for Chicago, IL which uses the same water source, Lake Michigan lists the calcium and magnesium as 34ppm and 11ppm respectively. This would total 45ppm total hardness (very soft water). The hardness of Chicago water is similar to Milwaukee's about 149-150ppm. The Chicago Consumer Confidence Report is not listing calcium and magnesium hardness, rather they list the concentrations of metallic calcium and magnesium as can be seen from the Milwaukee data.
Are the data listed for calcium and magnesium the hardness or metallic concentrations? As listed now these data are being used interchangeably and incorrectly.
The profile for Chicago, IL which uses the same water source, Lake Michigan lists the calcium and magnesium as 34ppm and 11ppm respectively. This would total 45ppm total hardness (very soft water). The hardness of Chicago water is similar to Milwaukee's about 149-150ppm. The Chicago Consumer Confidence Report is not listing calcium and magnesium hardness, rather they list the concentrations of metallic calcium and magnesium as can be seen from the Milwaukee data.
Are the data listed for calcium and magnesium the hardness or metallic concentrations? As listed now these data are being used interchangeably and incorrectly.