• Welcome to the new forum! We upgraded our forum software with a host of new boards, capabilities and features. It is also more secure.
    Jump in and join the conversation! You can learn more about the upgrade and new features here.

Water/grain ratio

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
Perhaps an inconsistency rather than a bug?

The first mash step (tested with infusion type 1st step, rest temperature type) in a mash profile correctly calculates water/grain ratio (based on amount of water with grain = total amount of water less any for deadspace). Subsequent mash steps calculate without removing deadspace. So ratio changes without adding water which obviously isn't right.

For BIAB even first step includes water added for deadspace. So ratio doesn't change through the steps, but the ratio is "wrong". The Step 1 details do not include a "mash tun deadspace addition" like a "normal" (not a BIAB) mash.

 

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
Not sure i follow, if you're setting up a single infusion(1) with a temp rest(2), your first volume will include the deadspace addition per your equipment profile. The second step will not add any liquid as it is a temp rest.

If you set up for a double infusion then the mash steps will provide a secondary volume to add to make the second mash temperature change. In the Mash section there's a check box to add for deadspace.

Can you upload a .bsmx with the recipe you're having concerns about and explain where you think the discrepancy is? you can alter the water/grain ratio, the deadspace volume, and the grain absorption rate as needed if you feel it's off.
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
The attached is what I'm brewing right now.

Ignore the kooky structure of the mash schedule as a more conventional structure acts the same way; it's my workaround to get a Grainfather Connect session to handle "strike" (which the makers don't believe it needs). "Strike" is the first step, an "infusion" step, "saccharification" the second step, a "temperature" step. The steps get out of order (hence numbered) so the "strike" step may need moving up to the top - but that's another issue.

The first, infusion, step includes the newish (v3 only?) "mash tun deadspace addition" and has the water/grain ratio as 2.7. Good.

The second, temperature, step does not have the "mash tun deadspace addition" field and includes that addition as a quantity in the water/grain ratio, so the ratio is now 3.45 despite no water addition.

for "BIAB" you never get a "mash tun deadspace addition" so the ratio is always 3.45. It was while messing with "BIAB" feature (using "full boil mash" with Grainfather Connect) that the problem showed itself.
 

Attachments

  • 5amsaint.bsmx
    47.4 KB · Views: 286

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
Trying to figure out your mashing goals here...

if you set up a single infusion to 144 it should automatically heat your water to the appropriate temperature?

Also, your grain temp and mash tun temps are 153.1, you input the temps BEFORE heating here.

I'm just trying to figure out what your goal schedule would look like,

how much water do you want to use, what temperature steps, how many steps.

your mash profile just looks totally messed up and i think thats your issue, is just setting it up properly, I'm sure theres some tutorials on setting up a mash profile as well, but I'll gladly try and help figure out what you've got going on here.
 

Oginme

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire, US
I am also confused by your steps in the mash schedule, but I think I understand your point. 

Once that initial water has been added and the water to grain ratio set, then the program considers all water addition in the subsequent steps.  On the surface, one might say that this skews the perception of water to grain when steps are considered.  Unlike a single infusion mash in a mash tun where the water under the false bottom and not in contact with the wort would only passively participate in the mashing process of solubilizing the starches and enzymes only through the osmosis of the fluids from the grain basket into the water below, the Grainfather has a pump which recirculates the fluid bringing it all into contact with the grain bed.  Additionally, with such a device, temperature steps would be done through that recirculating system and not with subsequent infusions of water.  I think this is what is confusing about the mash profile as it comes up.  Your steps are numbered 2. Saccharification, 1. Strike, and 3. Mash out.  Ideally, you would add the water and then strike with the grains initially at the lower temperature, then after suitable rest, bring the temperature up using the Grainfather to saccharification temperatures.  No additional water should be needed and the calculation of water to grain ratio which excludes the water under the mash pipe only comes into play at the initial water addition.

The fact that the subsequent water to grain calculations uses the water under the mash pipe in subsequent mash steps is really immaterial once you start recirculating it.

 

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
I would think your mash would look more like this if you're performing a single infusion mash? (assuming a 144F mash as you entered)
 

Attachments

  • 5am Saint EDITED.bsmx
    46.6 KB · Views: 292

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
Oginme said:
...  Your steps are numbered 2. Saccharification, 1. Strike, and 3. Mash out.  ...
Ah. So they are appearing out of order for you too. I mentioned this: "1. Strike" should be the 1st step. It appears to be an issue (not fixed by my attempts - prefixing the step name with order), but it isn't the one I intended to report in this thread.
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
dtapke said:
Trying to figure out your mashing goals here...

if you set up a single infusion to 144 it should automatically heat your water to the appropriate temperature?

Also, your grain temp and mash tun temps are 153.1, you input the temps BEFORE heating here.

I'm just trying to figure out what your goal schedule would look like,

how much water do you want to use, what temperature steps, how many steps.

your mash profile just looks totally messed up and i think thats your issue, is just setting it up properly, I'm sure theres some tutorials on setting up a mash profile as well, but I'll gladly try and help figure out what you've got going on here.
I did warn you of some kooky workarounds! But they are not the issue, and the workarounds do work (but having the grain temperature at strike temperature is an unfortunate consequence).

The issue is inconsistent handling of the "water/grain ratio".

If you've got the stamina (the articles are quite long) this gives you a good idea of what I'm doing:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/11engfVsgy6okCgLiuwb8gc2gaMVahiV7/view?usp=sharing
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ISrSYlK5q5Acf1xHgaZ8mC_0mm2UWuhA/view?usp=sharing
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
dtapke said:
I would think your mash would look more like this if you're performing a single infusion mash? (assuming a 144F mash as you entered)
Thanks. But that misses the point and has got way off subject. "Strike" step is described in Part 1 of my article under "mash profile with strike (optional)". It is done because Grainfathers have no concept of "strike", but I'm an "old dog" and won't learn these strike-less mash "new tricks".

I really shouldn't have posted that bsmx file. It was full of distracting little nibbets that haven't much to do with the issue I'm reporting (water/grain ratio).

The beer it features was what I was doing today, and is complete, waiting now for the yeast to burst into action.
 

Oginme

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire, US
PeeBee said:
Oginme said:
...  Your steps are numbered 2. Saccharification, 1. Strike, and 3. Mash out.  ...
Ah. So they are appearing out of order for you too. I mentioned this: "1. Strike" should be the 1st step. It appears to be an issue (not fixed by my attempts - prefixing the step name with order), but it isn't the one I intended to report in this thread.

When i changed the order, the water all came in on the first step and showed the corrected water to grain ratio.  After that, there was no more water added until the sparge. 
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
Oginme said:
PeeBee said:
Oginme said:
...  Your steps are numbered 2. Saccharification, 1. Strike, and 3. Mash out.  ...
Ah. So they are appearing out of order for you too. I mentioned this: "1. Strike" should be the 1st step. It appears to be an issue (not fixed by my attempts - prefixing the step name with order), but it isn't the one I intended to report in this thread.

When i changed the order, the water all came in on the first step and showed the corrected water to grain ratio.  After that, there was no more water added until the sparge.
That's it! But notice the water/grain ratio has changed for the subsequent steps (seemingly these include the deadspace which the first doesn't). It would be better if the ratio was not shown at all in the subsequent steps.

But if you were doing a "full boil mash" ("BIAB") even the first step is bad.
 

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
as oginme stated, changing your order also fixed that for me as well. and "Strike" isn't a task, but a temperature really, "strike" temp refers to the temp you need to reach to get the correct temperature for your mash. Therefore BS automatically provides you the "strike" temp when you set up a single infusion mash.

in fact even in your googledoc writeup your screenshots show the same thing. only the initial water addition.

Is the issue you're having perhaps that when you setup for a 67C mash, the grainfather connect does not automatically start with a temp high enough (75c?) to get your "Strike" temp?

 

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
remove your recoverable mash tun deadspace from your equipment profile if you don't want to see the different water/grain ratios.

It is not listing the recoverable mash tun deadspace in your "strike" but it will list it in subsequent steps.

I think i see what you're getting at here, but i guess its a non-issue so i wouldn't think twice about it lol.
 

dtapke

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Nov 5, 2018
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
Location
Portage, Wisconsin
if you change your recoverable mash loss to 0, and set up as a full boil this issue remedies itself. see my attached screenshots, is this how you'd prefer it to set up?
 

Attachments

  • w-g ratio.JPG
    w-g ratio.JPG
    76.2 KB · Views: 643
  • w-g ratio2.JPG
    w-g ratio2.JPG
    96.8 KB · Views: 594
  • different way.JPG
    different way.JPG
    97.5 KB · Views: 590

Oginme

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire, US
As someone who does 90+% full volume biab, i really don't pay attention to the water to grain ratio.  I want the full volume of water which would give me a water to grist ratio well in excess of the minimum needed to ensure good starch solubility and enzyme mobility.  When i do step infusions on my 3v system, i only really care about the effective water to grist ratio in 5hat first step to ensure i meet that minimum as well.  Not sure there is an issue here that makes a significant difference. 

I di see what you are looking at, just not sure why it matters beyond the initial infusion step.
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
dtapke said:
as oginme stated, changing your order also fixed that for me as well. and "Strike" isn't a task, but a temperature really, "strike" temp refers to the temp you need to reach to get the correct temperature for your mash. Therefore BS automatically provides you the "strike" temp when you set up a single infusion mash.

in fact even in your googledoc writeup your screenshots show the same thing. only the initial water addition.

Is the issue you're having perhaps that when you setup for a 67C mash, the grainfather connect does not automatically start with a temp high enough (75c?) to get your "Strike" temp?
You are right, "Strike" isn't a task. It is part two of a filthy fix to force Grainfather Connect (not Beersmith!) to include "strike" procedure as an automated mash step, so the Grainfather reaches strike temperature, beeps, and waits until the set button is pressed once the grain has been mixed in where upon it proceeds at mash temperature. So nothing to do with Beersmith, and the step looks pretty bazaar out of context with its part one (from which it forms). Sorry, I shouldn't have allowed something so distracting to appear in this thread.

But I will need time to consider whether setting "recoverable mash loss" to zero offers a useable work around for the water/grain ratio issue. Pity, the introduction of "recoverable mash tun deadspace" was a great advance (for BSv3 users), especially for users of Grainfathers (I run a 3V brewery too, in conjunction with Beersmith, the Grainfather is my "pilot" brewery). Thank you.
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
Oginme said:
As someone who does 90+% full volume biab, i really don't pay attention to the water to grain ratio.  I want the full volume of water which would give me a water to grist ratio well in excess of the minimum needed to ensure good starch solubility and enzyme mobility.  When i do step infusions on my 3v system, i only really care about the effective water to grist ratio in 5hat first step to ensure i meet that minimum as well.  Not sure there is an issue here that makes a significant difference. 

I di see what you are looking at, just not sure why it matters beyond the initial infusion step.
Thanks. I didn't pay much attention to water/grain ratio until I got this Grainfather and wanted to continue using Beersmith (because I also have a 1/2 barrel 3 vessel brewery too). I am also quite capable of working around the issues with Beersmith. But I wasn't asking for help, I was reporting an inconsistency in Beersmith, which this thread seems to have successfully proven.

The "water/grain ratio" is being calculated differently for the second and subsequent steps of a "normal" mash and for all steps in a "BIAB" type mash.

It probably came about when the new "recoverable mash tun deadspace" facility was introduced (which fixed some far more insidious issues). As a result of this thread it also high-lighted some other issues:

1: The order of mash steps is not stable (or user configurable). In v3 that is.

2: "Grain absorption" would be better as an Equipment parameter rather than a global parameter (which is made clearer by an older "fix" which split the global parameter in two, one for "BIAB").

3: The "mash tun deadspace addition" in mash steps shouldn't give the impression it can be edited (should be "greyed out").

Okay, the last two weren't "high-lighted" but did become more obvious meddling with this stuff.
 

Oginme

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire, US
I can say from experience with my own mash steps and also in altering yours that I can reorder the mash steps as you indicated they should be and it remains as such.  I opened up the mash tab and in the dialog box with the mash steps clicked once on the 'strike' step.  I then clicked on the icon below the dialog box labeled 'move step up' and it readjusted the order of the steps accordingly 1,2,3.  I saved the recipe and closed it before exiting out of BeerSmith.  I started BeerSmith a bit later and opened the recipe again and the steps were still in the corrected order.  I am not sure why this is not happening for you.

I fully agree that the grain absorption figure should be included in the equipment profile and have made this suggestion directly to Brad previously.  I am sure that if enough people request it that he would make the change in upcoming releases.  As someone who moves between various equipment set up, it is frustrating to have to go in and adjust the grain absorption figure for each.

Why should the mash tun addition not be editable?  It can always be adjusted within the recipe by editing the equipment profile and if I were to switch my Gott coolers around, I would need to change that figure as one has a false bottom but the other is just a braided coil.  Having it available to adjust gives me the flexibility to make that change without having to make a whole new equipment profile or editing that separately within the recipe.  I can think of arguments both ways but the biggest advantage BeerSmith has is the flexibility of use and adjusting the parameters not only of equipment but also of the root models to match the users process.  I know that there are other Grainfather users on this forum, maybe a direct question of how they were able to overcome the mash issue you are encountering might give you some new ideas.
 

PeeBee

Brewer
Joined
Aug 24, 2016
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Location
North Wales, UK
Oginme said:
? I can reorder the mash steps as you indicated they should be and it remains as such. ?

Nope, it's got it in for me! (See attachment).

Oginme said:
? I fully agree that the grain absorption figure should be included in the equipment profile ?
:)

Oginme said:
? Why should the mash tun addition not be editable?  It can always be adjusted within the recipe by editing the equipment profile and if I were to switch my Gott coolers around, I would need to change that figure as one has a false bottom but the other is just a braided coil.  Having it available to adjust gives me the flexibility to make that change without having to make a whole new equipment profile or editing that separately within the recipe.  I can think of arguments both ways but the biggest advantage BeerSmith has is the flexibility of use and adjusting the parameters not only of equipment but also of the root models to match the users process.  I know that there are other Grainfather users on this forum, maybe a direct question of how they were able to overcome the mash issue you are encountering might give you some new ideas.
I meant in the "mash step" on the Mash page (see attachments), it isn't editable there but the suggestion is that it is. Not a problem to me, but I have seen posts from others struggling with this.

I too am well happy with the flexibility of Beersmith, which will even bend to my kooky ideas. But I also write articles to translate ideas to others (like the articles I attached in this thread) and I'd rather not tell people to ignore this and that because "this and that" will lead you astray. It just doesn't come over as a recommendation to use Beersmith.

I do give other Grainfather users the opportunity to make suggestions about my ideas, but the article I attached attracted zero comment. I think this thread has taught me I might be thinking a good bit further in distance than just "outside of the box".
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    26.3 KB · Views: 516
  • Capture2.JPG
    Capture2.JPG
    16 KB · Views: 517

Oginme

Grandmaster Brewer
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
1
Location
New Hampshire, US
On the mash tab if you click on any step in the dialog box, you can click below to 'edit step' and that step will pop up for you to adjust.  Is this what you are looking for? 
 
Top