Decoction mashing is a great way to enhance the flavor and clarity of your all grain beer recipes, and requires only minimal additional equipment and time. Few homebrewers use decoction mashing in their recipes, but it is a very powerful technique for enhancing many styles of beer. This week we’re going to demystify decoction mashing so you can add it to your arsenal of homebrewing tools.
Decoction mashing involves nothing more than extracting a fraction of your mash mixture and bringing that portion to a boil in a separate vessel. Then the boiling wort is added back to the original wort to raise the temperature of the entire mixture for the next mash step. All that is required is a separate smaller pot and heat source.
History of Decoction Mashing
Decoction mashing predates common use of the thermometer. In those early days, it was difficult to achieve accurate infusion temperatures for today’s infusion mash, and also malts were undermodified compared to the highly modified malt we have today. Brewers instead discovered by trial and error that if they extracted a fixed fraction of the mash and boiled it they could achieve the accurate temperature steps needed to mash their malts.
Decoction was used extensitvely in continental European recipes, and is still heavily used in many German and Bohemian styles. Many commercial brewers today use decoction mashing as well because it results in higher extraction rates and also maximum extraction of flavor from the malt.
Why use Decoction Mashing
The first thing most all grain brewers learn is that they should not overheat their mash or they will risk killing off the enzymes needed to convert sugars, effectively stopping conversion. Yet in a strange paradox, decoction mashing actually results in higher conversion rates than infusion mashing. In fact, decoction mashing has a number of benefits (Ref: FAQ):
- Boiling extracts maximal flavor from the malt, which can be a real advantage for many malty styles of beer including most German beer styles.
- Boiling the mash destroys the grain cell walls, releasing additional enzymes for conversion and resulting in a higher extract conversion rate than infusion mashing.
- Boiling wort will carmelize a portion of it, again enhancing the malty flavor of the beer.
- Proteins in the mash tend to coagulate during the boil and are filtered out during lauter resulting in better clarity.
At the same time, some care must be taken while using the decoction method. Decoction does take longer than a single infusion mash. When heating the decocted fraction, you need to monitor it to avoid scorching the mash. Safety is a concern when handling large quantities of hot wort, and you must be careful not to splash the wort to avoid hot side aeration.
The Decoction Method
All decoction mashes start with a single infusion step where hot water is added to the mash to start the mashing process. Typical temperatures for the first step vary. Multiple step decoctions are often used. Some examples of steps include:
- 95F (35C) – Acid and Glucanese rest – to break down gummy solids (glucose) and lower pH of the mash for undermodified malts
- 127F (52C) – Protein rest
- 145F-153F (63-67C) – Beta Amalyse Rest
- 158-167F (72-75C) – Alpha Amalyse Rest
Decoction mash profiles may have one, two or even three decoctions. When selecting a decoction profile, keep in mind that many of the traditional multi-step decoction methods were designed for undermodified malts as opposed to modern modified malts. However, multiple step decoction methods will add a unique character and flavor to your beer.
The amount of water used in a decoction can vary tremendously. Traditional infusion mashes and many modern decoction methods use a relatively thick ratio of 1.25-1.5 quarts per pound of grain. Older decoction mash profiles often used much higher water to grain ratios – as high as 2 or even 3 quarts per pound of grain. Slightly higher conversion rates are possible at the lower ratios, but some purists still use the higher traditional ratios to reduce the chance of scorching. You also need to consider what will fit in your mash tun and boil pot.
The initial strike water is calculated as if it was a normal infusion, and can be done using the BeerSmith strike temperature tool or an online calculator. Typically the first infusion targets either 95F (an acid rest) or 127F (a protein rest).
After the infusion step, a fraction of the mash is decocted (drawn) and put in a separate pot to be slowly heated to a boil. Some people argue whether the thin part of the mash or thick part should be drawn. I generally try to get a representative sample of the mash, including both grains and wort.
Calculating the fraction of the mash to decoct can be easily done. A program like BeerSmith has both a separate tool for calculating decoctions and an integrated mash profile system that lets you simply select a decoction mash profile and automatically calculates the fractions and provides step by step mashing instructions.
Alternately, a quick google search will provide you with online decoction calculators. If you prefer doing it by hand, this article recommends the following fraction:
F = (TS – TI) / (TB – TI – X)
Where f is the fraction, TS is the target step temperature, TI is the initial (current) temperature, TB is the temperature of the boiling mash and X is an equipment dependent parameter (typically 18F or 10C).
Care must be taken when boiling the mash to avoid scorching. Mix the mash continuously and heat it gently. Once the decoction starts to boil you can add it back to the original mash and mix thoroughly to achieve the next step. Hold each step for the recommended time, much as you would with any infusion mash and continue with additional decoctions or sparging.
Finally, if you are using a decoction to achieve mash out temperature (usually around 178F target temperature), you need to draw only the liquid portion of the mash as mashing out with a large portion of grains can result in undesirable flavors.
I hope you enjoyed this week’s post. Please don’t hesitate to subscribe to the BeerSmith Home Brewing Blog for weekly articles on additional homebrewing topics. Also votes on social sites and BrewPoll are always appreciated.
Pingback: Beginner AG - Want more to read - Home Brew Forums
I am just starting out to make my own beer i think i will need all the help that i can get
leonard coker
Pingback: Attending my first S.N.O.B meeting … (Society of Northeast Ohio Brewers) | Cork and Kegs
I am an avid user of BeerSmith and highly recommend the software for any serious brewer. Today, I brewed a Bavarian Hefeweizen utilizing a single decoction mash. Long story short, I failed to reach my targeted saccharification temp, as after I added back my first decoction, I was only at about 135 (my protein rest for 30 minutes was spot on at 129). So, I decocted a second time, resulting in a saccharification temp of about 148 (only about four degrees short of my target), and decided to stay there for about 40 minutes. Upon pre-boil gravity, I was a full eight gravity units short of where I should be (target was 152).
From your article, and many others, decoction is supposed to yield greater efficiency. I am consistently a 80% efficiency single infusion all-grain brewer, so, in this case, I was only in the mid 60 range. Finally, your part about getting a good portion of the wort and grain into the decoction seems to go against traditional wisdom that says you should get the thickest part of the mash possible. Any advice would be much appreciated.
Pingback: All Grain Brewing - NathanBoyce.com
I understand that decoction mashing is relatively unnecessary because grains today are so well modified, but I had some difficulty using the timer in BeerSmith 2.0 while trying a decoction mash for a Marzen last night. Prior to beginning my brew I had not read this article. Instead, I was working out of John Palmer’s How to Brew book. His explanation on decoction mashing is far longer and a lot more steps. This made it difficult to use the timer and also resulted in an incredibly low yield to the boiling kettle (~ 1.5 gallons short). Palmer’s book adds the steps of resting the removed portion of mash for 20-30 minutes before beginning the boil. Is this necessary? What other sources are out there on decoction mashing?
I have tried triple decoction a couple of times with very good results. Using the usual insulated cool box mash tun and drawing only the thick part of the mash – use a kitchen sieve to leave behind all the liquid. For a boil pot I have a very large aluminium pot on the gas cooker. The first time I found that the recommended amount to decoct and boil did not raise the mash temperature high enough when returned to the mash tun, so had do a few ‘intermediate’ decoctions to bring the temperatures up. Next time round I always removed a fair bit more than suggested so always had a reserve of boiling mash from which to adjust up the temperatures.
As always the ubiquitous Youtube has something. I found this one very helpful.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_V1zt0mW084
I was very pleased how well my ‘Pilsner Urquell’ and ‘Stella Artois’ attempts worked out. Both full gravity, malty and cleared well.
Pingback: The Benefits of Decoction Mashing | Craft Beer in the 303 – Denver Metro
Hace más de dos ó tres años que tengo el software y me ha ayudado a confeccionar recetas de cervezas de todos los estilos . Y es muy buena y se las recomiendo antes de hacerla .-
Gracias
I can’t figure out what BeerSmith is doing with the calculations for a decoction mash. My first rest (acid rest) has a water/grain ratio of 2.6. Then the 2nd rest (saccharification) which is the decoction step has a water/grain ratio of 2.780. Why? I haven’t added any additional water. There is an error message which reads “Can’t have a negative infusion volume – add more water”. The “water to add” field is disabled and displays “-0.00”. Is this a bug in the software?
If barley malt and broken rice ratio is 50:50 then actual mashing profile what should be if beer body is to be kept 1.5*p to 1.7*p